Abstract
This case study explores the roles and responsibilities of a midwife working with a woman who has previously undergone female genital mutilation (FGM). The dilemma is presented by the wishes of the husband, who wants the infibulation reinstated after the birth in direct contravention of the law. The midwife’s decisions and communication are carefully articulated to ensure that she takes account of her legal responsibility. FGM is illegal in the UK and there is a mandatory reporting responsibility for all health professionals who encounter a woman or girl who has undergone FGM or is at risk of this.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Dilemmas and Decision Making in Midwifery |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Practice-based Approach |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 83-94 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781040371855 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781915080233 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sara: ‘return it to how it was…’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver