Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of sphingosine-1-phosphotase receptor modulators

  • Asim Ahmed Elnour
  • , Adel Sadeq
  • , Farah Hamad Farah
  • , Noor Alhouda Kassem
  • , Haia Abdulsamad
  • , N. Al Mazrouei
  • , Israa Yousif Khidir
  • , Doaa Nassar
  • , Abubakar B. Abubakar
  • , Abdelgadir Elamin
  • , Abdulla Al Amoodi
  • , Sasha Mohammed Elamin Suliman
  • , Mohamed Elamin Hassan
  • , Noora Alhajri
  • , Ekrima Elmoeiz Gaffar Osman
  • , Salma Mohamed Magboul
  • , Judit Don
  • , Jamila Alaryani
  • , Islam Moahmmed Abd Alla
  • , Warda Salah Mohammed Elkhalifa
  • Nadeen T. Ali, Hanan Siddig Ali Alamin, Hagar Awad Abdelrahim, Sahar Asim Ahmed Elnour, Asil Adel, Wadah Mohamed Ali Khogali, Haya Hamed Ahmed Lulu
  • Abu Dhabi Health Services Company
  • Omdurman Islamic University
  • Monash University
  • Riyadh Elm University
  • Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City
  • Ibn Sina University
  • Marabat Pharmacy
  • Managel University for Science and Technology
  • University of Khartoum
  • Aldamer Teaching Hospital
  • Dentist
  • Trinity College Dublin
  • Bin Sina Pharmacy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators is a new group that possesses some advantages over the other conventional therapy for multiple sclerosis. Aim of the review: The aim is to assess the efficacy and safety of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators. Methods: The protocol has been developed based on the PRISMA-P checklist by using (PICO [population, intervention, comparators, and outcome]) items, for adult subjects who have received Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators (amiselimod; ozanimod; ponesimod; siponimod) in randomized clinical trials. The subjects with multiple sclerosis (population) receiving sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator (intervention) will be compared to placebo or other modalities of multiple sclerosis (comparators), for the non-inferiority or superiority in terms of effects on walk, disability, relapse and/or other disease clinical markers (outcome). The secondary safety outcomes such as treatment-emergent adverse events and Quality of Life-54 will be assessed as well. The RevMan will be used to quantify the synthesis of data. Whereas I2 index, tau squared, and the Q-test P value will be used to examine heterogeneity among individual trials’ effect sizes. Conclusion: This protocol will report the differences in the efficacy and safety of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (intervention) as compared to the placebo or other modalities (comparators).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1252-1262
Number of pages11
JournalSystematic Reviews in Pharmacy
Volume11
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2020

Keywords

  • Amiselimod
  • Multiple sclerosis (MS)
  • Ozanimod
  • Ponesimod
  • Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), siponimod

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of sphingosine-1-phosphotase receptor modulators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this