Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Original paper: Efficacy and safety analysis of insulin degludec/insulin aspart compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30: A phase 3, multicentre, international, open-label, randomised, treat-to-target trial in patients with type 2 diabetes fasting during Ramadan

  • Mohamed Hassanein
  • , Akram Salim Echtay
  • , Rachid Malek
  • , Mahomed Omar
  • , Shehla Sajid Shaikh
  • , Magnus Ekelund
  • , Kadriye Kaplan
  • , Nor Azmi Kamaruddin
  • Rafik Hariri University
  • Ferhat Abbas Sétif University 1
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal
  • Prince Aly Khan Hospital
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation
  • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) and biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) before, during and after Ramadan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who fasted during Ramadan. Methods In this multinational, randomised, treat-to-target trial, patients with T2DM who intended to fast and were on basal, pre- or self-mixed insulin ± oral antidiabetic drugs for ≥90 days were randomised (1:1) to IDegAsp twice daily (BID) or BIAsp 30 BID. Treatment period included pre-Ramadan treatment initiation (with insulin titration for 8–20 weeks), Ramadan (4 weeks) and post-Ramadan (4 weeks). Insulin doses were reduced by 30–50% for the pre-dawn meal (suhur) on the first day of Ramadan, and readjusted to the pre-Ramadan levels at the end of Ramadan. Hypoglycaemia was analysed as overall (severe or plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L [56 mg/dL]), nocturnal (00:01–05:59) or severe (requiring assistance of another person). Results During the treatment period, IDegAsp (n = 131) had significantly lower overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates with similar glycaemic efficacy, versus BIAsp 30 (n = 132). During Ramadan, despite achieving significantly lower pre-iftar (meal at sunset) self-measured plasma glucose (estimated treatment difference: −0.54 mmol/L [−1.02; −0.07]95% CI, p =.0247; post hoc) with similar overall glycaemic efficacy, IDegAsp showed significantly lower overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates versus BIAsp 30. Conclusions IDegAsp is a suitable therapeutic agent for patients who need insulin for sustained glucose control before, during and after Ramadan fasting, with a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia, versus BIAsp 30, an existing premixed insulin analogue.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)218-226
Number of pages9
JournalDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume135
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Biphasic insulin aspart 30
  • Hypoglycaemia
  • Insulin degludec/insulin aspart
  • Ramadan fasting
  • Type 2 diabetes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Original paper: Efficacy and safety analysis of insulin degludec/insulin aspart compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30: A phase 3, multicentre, international, open-label, randomised, treat-to-target trial in patients with type 2 diabetes fasting during Ramadan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this