Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Leader–member exchange (LMX) and work performance: an application of self-determination theory in the work context

  • Zayed University, Abu Dhabi Campus

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using self-determination theory (SDT) as a guiding framework, we examined the effects of leader–member exchange (LMX) on performance through psychological need satisfaction and intrinsic motivation. Lagged data was collected from 333 dental hygienists across four time points. We examined three forms of performance: task performance, organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), and counterproductive work behaviour (CWB). LMX was positively related to all three forms of psychological need satisfaction (competence, relatedness, autonomy), autonomy need satisfaction was positively related to intrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation was negatively related to CWB. Overall, there were significant indirect effects from LMX to all forms of performance; however, the mediating mechanisms varied. LMX was indirectly linked to task performance through competence need satisfaction and autonomy need satisfaction, to OCB through competence need satisfaction, and to CWB through the sequential effects of autonomy need satisfaction on intrinsic motivation. Our results highlight the complexity of the LMX-performance relationship and show that SDT can help to explain the relationship, depending on the type of performance being assessed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-324
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Leader–member exchange
  • counterproductive work behaviour
  • organizational citizenship behaviour
  • performance
  • self-determination theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leader–member exchange (LMX) and work performance: an application of self-determination theory in the work context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this