Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment Performed With and Without a Dental Operating Microscope: A Randomised Clinical Trial

  • Vivek Hegde
  • , Srilatha Shanmugasundaram
  • , Hussain Abbas Mookhtiar
  • , Khatija Iqbal Memon
  • , Nishat Anjum Nagaonkar
  • , Nandini Suresh
  • , Velmurugan Natanasabapathy
  • , Henry F. Duncan
  • , Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu
  • M.A. Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Center
  • Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research
  • Dublin Dental University Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain levels in patients with necrotic teeth after non-surgical root canal treatment (NSRCT) using or not using a dental operating microscope (DOM). One hundred patients with pulp necrosis and symptomatic apical periodontitis were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 50): Group 1 (DOM) and Group 2 (no DOM). Postoperative pain was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 6 h, 12 h, 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days. The pain intensity was determined by calculating the mean pain score at each interval and was statistically analysed. The results showed no significant difference in pain intensity between the two groups. However, gender and tooth type affected pain levels at 6 h, 12 h, and 1 day. In conclusion, using a DOM during NSRCT did not significantly reduce postoperative pain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-775
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Endodontic Journal
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • microscope
  • post endodontic pain
  • randomised clinical trial
  • root canal treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment Performed With and Without a Dental Operating Microscope: A Randomised Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this