TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic Accuracy of a Convolutional Neural Network Assessment of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Compared With PET With CT Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging
AU - SPUTNIK investigators
AU - Weir-McCall, Jonathan R.
AU - Debruyn, Elise
AU - Harris, Scott
AU - Qureshi, Nagmi R.
AU - Rintoul, Robert C.
AU - Gleeson, Fergus V.
AU - Gilbert, Fiona J.
AU - Lucy Brindle, Anindo Banerjee
AU - Callister, Matthew
AU - Clegg, Andrew
AU - Cook, Andrew
AU - Cozens, Kelly
AU - Crosbie, Philip
AU - Dizdarevic, Sabina
AU - Eaton, Rosemary
AU - Eichhorst, Kathrin
AU - Frew, Anthony
AU - Groves, Ashley
AU - Han, Sai
AU - Jones, Jeremy
AU - Kankam, Osie
AU - Karunasaagarar, Kavitasagary
AU - Kurban, Lutfi
AU - Little, Louisa
AU - Madden, Jackie
AU - McClement, Chris
AU - Miles, Ken
AU - Moate, Patricia
AU - Peebles, Charles
AU - Pike, Lucy
AU - Poon, Fat Wui
AU - Sinclair, Donald
AU - Shah, Andrew
AU - Vale, Luke
AU - George, Steve
AU - Riley, Richard
AU - Lodge, Andrea
AU - Buscombe, John
AU - Green, Theresa
AU - Stone, Amanda
AU - Navani, Neal
AU - Shortman, Robert
AU - Azzopardi, Gabriella
AU - Doffman, Sarah
AU - Bush, Janice
AU - Lyttle, Jane
AU - Jacob, Kenneth
AU - Horst, Joris van der
AU - Sarvesvaran, Joseph
AU - McLaren, Barbara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American College of Chest Physicians
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Background: Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) measuring 8 to 30 mm in diameter require further workup to determine the likelihood of malignancy. Research Question: What is the diagnostic performance of a lung cancer prediction convolutional neural network (LCP-CNN) in SPNs using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT imaging compared with the current clinical workup? Study Design and Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the Single Pulmonary Nodule Investigation: Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography in the Characterisation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules trial, a prospective multicenter study comparing the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT imaging with PET imaging in SPNs. The LCP-CNN was designed and validated in an external cohort. LCP-CNN-generated risk scores were created from the noncontrast and contrast-enhanced CT scan images from the DCE CT imaging. The gold standard was histologic analysis or 2 years of follow-up. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were calculated using LCP-CNN score, maximum standardized uptake value, and DCE CT scan maximum enhancement and were compared using the DeLong test. Results: Two hundred seventy participants (mean ± SD age, 68.3 ± 8.8 years; 49% women) underwent PET with CT scan imaging and DCE CT imaging with CT scan data available centrally for LCP-CNN analysis. The accuracy of the LCP-CNN on the noncontrast images (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88) was superior to that of DCE CT imaging (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82; P = .03) and equal to that of PET with CT scan imaging (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.90; P = .35). The presence of contrast resulted in a small reduction in diagnostic accuracy, with the AUC falling from 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88) on the noncontrast images to 0.80 to 0.83 after contrast (P < .05 for 240 s after contrast only). Interpretation: An LCP-CNN algorithm provides an AUC equivalent to PET with CT scan imaging in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier; No.:
AB - Background: Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) measuring 8 to 30 mm in diameter require further workup to determine the likelihood of malignancy. Research Question: What is the diagnostic performance of a lung cancer prediction convolutional neural network (LCP-CNN) in SPNs using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT imaging compared with the current clinical workup? Study Design and Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the Single Pulmonary Nodule Investigation: Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography in the Characterisation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules trial, a prospective multicenter study comparing the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT imaging with PET imaging in SPNs. The LCP-CNN was designed and validated in an external cohort. LCP-CNN-generated risk scores were created from the noncontrast and contrast-enhanced CT scan images from the DCE CT imaging. The gold standard was histologic analysis or 2 years of follow-up. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were calculated using LCP-CNN score, maximum standardized uptake value, and DCE CT scan maximum enhancement and were compared using the DeLong test. Results: Two hundred seventy participants (mean ± SD age, 68.3 ± 8.8 years; 49% women) underwent PET with CT scan imaging and DCE CT imaging with CT scan data available centrally for LCP-CNN analysis. The accuracy of the LCP-CNN on the noncontrast images (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88) was superior to that of DCE CT imaging (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82; P = .03) and equal to that of PET with CT scan imaging (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.90; P = .35). The presence of contrast resulted in a small reduction in diagnostic accuracy, with the AUC falling from 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88) on the noncontrast images to 0.80 to 0.83 after contrast (P < .05 for 240 s after contrast only). Interpretation: An LCP-CNN algorithm provides an AUC equivalent to PET with CT scan imaging in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier; No.:
KW - X-ray computed
KW - diagnostic test accuracy
KW - machine learning
KW - positron emission tomography computed tomography
KW - solitary pulmonary nodule
KW - tomography
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85146129097
U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2227
DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2227
M3 - Article
C2 - 36087795
AN - SCOPUS:85146129097
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 163
SP - 444
EP - 454
JO - Chest
JF - Chest
IS - 2
ER -