Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria, Phase III-C Report: Assessment of Patient Scenarios (Derivation Cohort) and Refinement of Definitions

  • New APS Classification Criteria Collaborators
  • Cornell University
  • CHU de Nancy
  • Hospital for Special Surgery - New York
  • American British Cowdray Medical Center
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • University of Ljubljana
  • King's College London
  • University of Utah
  • Université Paris Cité
  • Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Ghent University
  • University of Washington
  • Hospital Clínic of Barcelona
  • Université de Lorraine
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University
  • Duke University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera Molinette San Giovanni Battista Di Torino
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
  • Université de Lille
  • Middlemore Hospital
  • Auckland District Health Board
  • Harvard University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria aim to identify patients with a high likelihood of APS for research. Phases I/II of our four-phase methodologic approach resulted in 27 candidate criteria organized in clinical and laboratory domains. Here, we summarize phase III efforts to reduce and refine criteria using patient scenarios. Methods: Using standardized definitions for candidate criteria, the Steering Committee collected antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)–positive cases referred for “suspected APS.” Treating physicians assessed APS case likelihood using a Likert scale. Poisson regression calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify the direction and size of the association of candidate criteria with “highly likely” versus “equivocal or unlikely” APS, which guided Steering Committee candidate criteria refinement and organization. Results: We collected 314 suspected APS cases (137 [44%] highly likely and 177 [56%] equivocal/unlikely APS). Provoking venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thrombosis (AT) risk factors reduced the size of the association with highly likely APS (RR 4.31 [95% CI 2.11–8.78] to RR 1.56 [95% CI 0.89–2.75] for VTE and RR 3.48 [95% CI 1.91–6.32] to RR 1.64 [95% CI 0.77–3.51] for AT). Persistent lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin IgG antibody ≥40 U, and anti–β2-glycoprotein-I IgG antibody ≥40 U were positively associated with highly likely APS (all P < 0.05). Eventually, items within eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains were refined. Conclusion: Referred suspected APS cases provided insight into associations of individual candidate criteria with APS likelihood. RR analyses helped refine items and organize the draft classification system into eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-573
Number of pages11
JournalArthritis Care and Research
Volume78
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria, Phase III-C Report: Assessment of Patient Scenarios (Derivation Cohort) and Refinement of Definitions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this