TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria, Phase III-C Report
T2 - Assessment of Patient Scenarios (Derivation Cohort) and Refinement of Definitions
AU - New APS Classification Criteria Collaborators
AU - Barbhaiya, Medha
AU - Zuily, Stephane
AU - Jannat-Khah, Deanna
AU - Amigo, Mary Carmen
AU - Andrade, Danieli
AU - Avcin, Tadej
AU - Bertolaccini, Maria L.
AU - Branch, D. Ware
AU - Costedoat-Chalumeau, Nathalie
AU - de Jesús, Guilherme Ramires
AU - Devreese, Katrien M.J.
AU - Garcia, David
AU - Gomez Puerta, Jose A.
AU - Guillemin, Francis
AU - Levine, Steven R.
AU - Levy, Roger A.
AU - Lockshin, Michael D.
AU - Ortel, Thomas L.
AU - Petri, Michelle
AU - Sanna, Giovanni
AU - Sciascia, Savino
AU - Seshan, Surya V.
AU - Tektonidou, Maria
AU - Wahl, Denis
AU - Willis, Rohan
AU - Yelnik, Cecile
AU - Hendry, Alison
AU - Naden, Ray
AU - Costenbader, Karen H.
AU - Erkan, Doruk
AU - Barbhaiya, Medha
AU - Costenbader, Karen H.
AU - Erkan, Doruk
AU - Guillemin, Francis
AU - Hendry, Alison
AU - Naden, Ray
AU - Zuily, Stephane
AU - Amigo, Mary Carmen
AU - Avcin, Tadej
AU - Bertolaccini, Maria L.
AU - Branch, D. Ware
AU - de Jesús, Guilherme Ramires
AU - Devreese, Katrien M.J.
AU - Garcia, David
AU - Levine, Steven R.
AU - Levy, Roger A.
AU - Lockshin, Michael D.
AU - Ortel, Thomas L.
AU - Sciascia, Savino
AU - Khamashta, Munther
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American College of Rheumatology.
PY - 2026/5
Y1 - 2026/5
N2 - Objective: The 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria aim to identify patients with a high likelihood of APS for research. Phases I/II of our four-phase methodologic approach resulted in 27 candidate criteria organized in clinical and laboratory domains. Here, we summarize phase III efforts to reduce and refine criteria using patient scenarios. Methods: Using standardized definitions for candidate criteria, the Steering Committee collected antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)–positive cases referred for “suspected APS.” Treating physicians assessed APS case likelihood using a Likert scale. Poisson regression calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify the direction and size of the association of candidate criteria with “highly likely” versus “equivocal or unlikely” APS, which guided Steering Committee candidate criteria refinement and organization. Results: We collected 314 suspected APS cases (137 [44%] highly likely and 177 [56%] equivocal/unlikely APS). Provoking venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thrombosis (AT) risk factors reduced the size of the association with highly likely APS (RR 4.31 [95% CI 2.11–8.78] to RR 1.56 [95% CI 0.89–2.75] for VTE and RR 3.48 [95% CI 1.91–6.32] to RR 1.64 [95% CI 0.77–3.51] for AT). Persistent lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin IgG antibody ≥40 U, and anti–β2-glycoprotein-I IgG antibody ≥40 U were positively associated with highly likely APS (all P < 0.05). Eventually, items within eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains were refined. Conclusion: Referred suspected APS cases provided insight into associations of individual candidate criteria with APS likelihood. RR analyses helped refine items and organize the draft classification system into eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains.
AB - Objective: The 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria aim to identify patients with a high likelihood of APS for research. Phases I/II of our four-phase methodologic approach resulted in 27 candidate criteria organized in clinical and laboratory domains. Here, we summarize phase III efforts to reduce and refine criteria using patient scenarios. Methods: Using standardized definitions for candidate criteria, the Steering Committee collected antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)–positive cases referred for “suspected APS.” Treating physicians assessed APS case likelihood using a Likert scale. Poisson regression calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify the direction and size of the association of candidate criteria with “highly likely” versus “equivocal or unlikely” APS, which guided Steering Committee candidate criteria refinement and organization. Results: We collected 314 suspected APS cases (137 [44%] highly likely and 177 [56%] equivocal/unlikely APS). Provoking venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thrombosis (AT) risk factors reduced the size of the association with highly likely APS (RR 4.31 [95% CI 2.11–8.78] to RR 1.56 [95% CI 0.89–2.75] for VTE and RR 3.48 [95% CI 1.91–6.32] to RR 1.64 [95% CI 0.77–3.51] for AT). Persistent lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin IgG antibody ≥40 U, and anti–β2-glycoprotein-I IgG antibody ≥40 U were positively associated with highly likely APS (all P < 0.05). Eventually, items within eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains were refined. Conclusion: Referred suspected APS cases provided insight into associations of individual candidate criteria with APS likelihood. RR analyses helped refine items and organize the draft classification system into eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030289230
U2 - 10.1002/acr.25599
DO - 10.1002/acr.25599
M3 - Article
C2 - 40621809
AN - SCOPUS:105030289230
SN - 2151-464X
VL - 78
SP - 563
EP - 573
JO - Arthritis Care and Research
JF - Arthritis Care and Research
IS - 5
ER -