TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and preliminary validation of the Behçet’s syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI)
AU - Piga, Matteo
AU - Floris, Alberto
AU - Espinosa, Gerard
AU - Pinto, Luísa Serpa
AU - Kougkas, Nikolaos
AU - Monaco, Andrea Lo
AU - Lopalco, Giuseppe
AU - Orlando, Ida
AU - Pirani, Vittorio
AU - Santos, Ernestina
AU - Bertsias, George
AU - Cantarini, Luca
AU - Cauli, Alberto
AU - Cervera, Ricard
AU - Correia, João
AU - Govoni, Marcello
AU - Iannone, Florenzo
AU - Neri, Piergiorgio
AU - Silva, Ana Martins
AU - Vasconcelos, Carlos
AU - Muntoni, Monica
AU - Mathieu, Alessandro
AU - Chessa, Elisabetta
AU - Ciancio, Giovanni
AU - Congia, Mattia
AU - Faria, Raquel
AU - Rios Garcés, Roberto
AU - Guerrini, Giulio
AU - Ibáñez, Gema Lledó
AU - Mascia, Piero
AU - Pinto, Ignasi Rodriguez
AU - Pinto, Ignasi Rodriguez
AU - Venerito, Vincenzo
AU - Vitale, Antonio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Objective To develop and validate the evidence-based and consensus-based Behçet’s Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI). Methods Starting from 120 literature-retrieved preliminary items, the BODI underwent multiple Delphi rounds with an international multidisciplinary panel consisting of rheumatologists, internists, ophthalmologists, neurologists, and patient delegates until consensus was reached on the final content. The BODI was validated in a cross-sectional multicentre cohort of 228 patients with Behçet’s syndrome (BS) through the study of (a) correlation between BODI and Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) and (b) correlation between BODI and disease activity measures (ie, Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF), Physician Global Assessment (PGA), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA)), c) content and face validity and (d) feasibility. Results The final BODI consists of 4 overarching principles and 46 unweighted-items grouped into 9 organ domains. It showed good to excellent reliability, with a mean Cohen’s k of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.90) and a mean intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.95). Overall, 128 (56.1%) patients had a BODI score ≥1, with a median score of 1.0 (range 0–14). The BODI significantly correlated with the VDI (r=0.693, p<0.001), demonstrating to effectively measure damage (construct validity), but had greater sensitivity in identifying major organ damage and did not correlate with disease activity measures (ie, BDCAF: p=0.807, PGA: p=0.820, PtGA: p=0.794) discriminating damage from the major confounding factor. The instrument was deemed credible (face validity), complete (content validity) and feasible by an independent group of clinicians. Conclusions Pending further validation, the BODI may be used to assess organ damage in patients with BS in the context of observational and controlled trials.
AB - Objective To develop and validate the evidence-based and consensus-based Behçet’s Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI). Methods Starting from 120 literature-retrieved preliminary items, the BODI underwent multiple Delphi rounds with an international multidisciplinary panel consisting of rheumatologists, internists, ophthalmologists, neurologists, and patient delegates until consensus was reached on the final content. The BODI was validated in a cross-sectional multicentre cohort of 228 patients with Behçet’s syndrome (BS) through the study of (a) correlation between BODI and Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) and (b) correlation between BODI and disease activity measures (ie, Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF), Physician Global Assessment (PGA), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA)), c) content and face validity and (d) feasibility. Results The final BODI consists of 4 overarching principles and 46 unweighted-items grouped into 9 organ domains. It showed good to excellent reliability, with a mean Cohen’s k of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.90) and a mean intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.95). Overall, 128 (56.1%) patients had a BODI score ≥1, with a median score of 1.0 (range 0–14). The BODI significantly correlated with the VDI (r=0.693, p<0.001), demonstrating to effectively measure damage (construct validity), but had greater sensitivity in identifying major organ damage and did not correlate with disease activity measures (ie, BDCAF: p=0.807, PGA: p=0.820, PtGA: p=0.794) discriminating damage from the major confounding factor. The instrument was deemed credible (face validity), complete (content validity) and feasible by an independent group of clinicians. Conclusions Pending further validation, the BODI may be used to assess organ damage in patients with BS in the context of observational and controlled trials.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85088502162
U2 - 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001192
DO - 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001192
M3 - Article
C2 - 32703843
AN - SCOPUS:85088502162
SN - 2056-5933
VL - 6
JO - RMD Open
JF - RMD Open
IS - 2
M1 - e001192
ER -