Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development and preliminary validation of the Behçet’s syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI)

  • Matteo Piga
  • , Alberto Floris
  • , Gerard Espinosa
  • , Luísa Serpa Pinto
  • , Nikolaos Kougkas
  • , Andrea Lo Monaco
  • , Giuseppe Lopalco
  • , Ida Orlando
  • , Vittorio Pirani
  • , Ernestina Santos
  • , George Bertsias
  • , Luca Cantarini
  • , Alberto Cauli
  • , Ricard Cervera
  • , João Correia
  • , Marcello Govoni
  • , Florenzo Iannone
  • , Piergiorgio Neri
  • , Ana Martins Silva
  • , Carlos Vasconcelos
  • Monica Muntoni, Alessandro Mathieu, Elisabetta Chessa, Giovanni Ciancio, Mattia Congia, Raquel Faria, Roberto Rios Garcés, Giulio Guerrini, Gema Lledó Ibáñez, Piero Mascia, Ignasi Rodriguez Pinto, Ignasi Rodriguez Pinto, Vincenzo Venerito, Antonio Vitale
  • University Hospital of Cagliari
  • University of Barcelona
  • University Hospital Center of Santo António
  • University of Crete
  • University of Ferrara
  • University of Bari
  • University of Siena
  • Marche Polytechnic University
  • University of Porto
  • Associazione Italiana Sindrome e Malattia di Behçet (SIMBA)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective To develop and validate the evidence-based and consensus-based Behçet’s Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI). Methods Starting from 120 literature-retrieved preliminary items, the BODI underwent multiple Delphi rounds with an international multidisciplinary panel consisting of rheumatologists, internists, ophthalmologists, neurologists, and patient delegates until consensus was reached on the final content. The BODI was validated in a cross-sectional multicentre cohort of 228 patients with Behçet’s syndrome (BS) through the study of (a) correlation between BODI and Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) and (b) correlation between BODI and disease activity measures (ie, Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF), Physician Global Assessment (PGA), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA)), c) content and face validity and (d) feasibility. Results The final BODI consists of 4 overarching principles and 46 unweighted-items grouped into 9 organ domains. It showed good to excellent reliability, with a mean Cohen’s k of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.90) and a mean intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.95). Overall, 128 (56.1%) patients had a BODI score ≥1, with a median score of 1.0 (range 0–14). The BODI significantly correlated with the VDI (r=0.693, p<0.001), demonstrating to effectively measure damage (construct validity), but had greater sensitivity in identifying major organ damage and did not correlate with disease activity measures (ie, BDCAF: p=0.807, PGA: p=0.820, PtGA: p=0.794) discriminating damage from the major confounding factor. The instrument was deemed credible (face validity), complete (content validity) and feasible by an independent group of clinicians. Conclusions Pending further validation, the BODI may be used to assess organ damage in patients with BS in the context of observational and controlled trials.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere001192
JournalRMD Open
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and preliminary validation of the Behçet’s syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this