TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus Practice Guidelines on Postdural Puncture Headache From a Multisociety, International Working Group A Summary Report
AU - Uppal, Vishal
AU - Russell, Robin
AU - Sondekoppam, Rakesh
AU - Ansari, Jessica
AU - Baber, Zafeer
AU - Chen, Yian
AU - DelPizzo, Kathryn
AU - Dîrzu, Dan Sebastian
AU - Kalagara, Hari
AU - Kissoon, Narayan R.
AU - Kranz, Peter G.
AU - Leffert, Lisa
AU - Lim, Grace
AU - Lobo, Clara A.
AU - Lucas, Dominique Nuala
AU - Moka, Eleni
AU - Rodriguez, Stephen E.
AU - Sehmbi, Herman
AU - Vallejo, Manuel C.
AU - Volk, Thomas
AU - Narouze, Samer
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Uppal V et al.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - IMPORTANCE Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures, such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. OBJECTIVE To fill the practice guidelines void and provide comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations for preventing, diagnosing, and managing PDPH. EVIDENCE REVIEW With input from committee members and stakeholders of 6 participating professional societies, 10 review questions that were deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH were developed. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE on March 2, 2022. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews, and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for practice guideline development and shared with collaborator groups. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations that were rated according to the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence. Collaborators were asked to vote anonymously on each recommendation using 2 rounds of a modified Delphi approach. FINDINGS After 2 rounds of electronic voting by a 21-member multidisciplinary collaborator team, 47 recommendations were generated to provide guidance on the risk factors for and the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH, along with ratings for the strength and certainty of evidence. A 90% to 100% consensus was obtained for almost all recommendations. Several recommendations were rated as having moderate to low certainty. Opportunities for future research were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this consensus statement suggest that current approaches to the treatment and management of PDPH are not uniform due to the paucity of evidence. The practice guidelines, however, provide a framework for individual clinicians to assess PDPH risk, confirm the diagnosis, and adopt a systematic approach to its management.
AB - IMPORTANCE Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures, such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. OBJECTIVE To fill the practice guidelines void and provide comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations for preventing, diagnosing, and managing PDPH. EVIDENCE REVIEW With input from committee members and stakeholders of 6 participating professional societies, 10 review questions that were deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH were developed. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE on March 2, 2022. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews, and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for practice guideline development and shared with collaborator groups. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations that were rated according to the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence. Collaborators were asked to vote anonymously on each recommendation using 2 rounds of a modified Delphi approach. FINDINGS After 2 rounds of electronic voting by a 21-member multidisciplinary collaborator team, 47 recommendations were generated to provide guidance on the risk factors for and the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH, along with ratings for the strength and certainty of evidence. A 90% to 100% consensus was obtained for almost all recommendations. Several recommendations were rated as having moderate to low certainty. Opportunities for future research were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this consensus statement suggest that current approaches to the treatment and management of PDPH are not uniform due to the paucity of evidence. The practice guidelines, however, provide a framework for individual clinicians to assess PDPH risk, confirm the diagnosis, and adopt a systematic approach to its management.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85168192742
U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25387
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25387
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37581893
AN - SCOPUS:85168192742
SN - 2574-3805
VL - 6
JO - JAMA network open
JF - JAMA network open
IS - 8
M1 - e2325387
ER -