Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consensus Practice Guidelines on Postdural Puncture Headache From a Multisociety, International Working Group A Summary Report

  • Vishal Uppal
  • , Robin Russell
  • , Rakesh Sondekoppam
  • , Jessica Ansari
  • , Zafeer Baber
  • , Yian Chen
  • , Kathryn DelPizzo
  • , Dan Sebastian Dîrzu
  • , Hari Kalagara
  • , Narayan R. Kissoon
  • , Peter G. Kranz
  • , Lisa Leffert
  • , Grace Lim
  • , Clara A. Lobo
  • , Dominique Nuala Lucas
  • , Eleni Moka
  • , Stephen E. Rodriguez
  • , Herman Sehmbi
  • , Manuel C. Vallejo
  • , Thomas Volk
  • Samer Narouze
  • Dalhousie University
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Iowa
  • Stanford University
  • Tufts University
  • Hospital for Special Surgery - New York
  • Emergency County Hospital
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, FL
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Duke University
  • Yale University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust
  • Creta Interclinic Hospital
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
  • Western University
  • West Virginia University
  • Saarland University
  • Western Reserve Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures, such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. OBJECTIVE To fill the practice guidelines void and provide comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations for preventing, diagnosing, and managing PDPH. EVIDENCE REVIEW With input from committee members and stakeholders of 6 participating professional societies, 10 review questions that were deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH were developed. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE on March 2, 2022. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews, and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for practice guideline development and shared with collaborator groups. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations that were rated according to the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence. Collaborators were asked to vote anonymously on each recommendation using 2 rounds of a modified Delphi approach. FINDINGS After 2 rounds of electronic voting by a 21-member multidisciplinary collaborator team, 47 recommendations were generated to provide guidance on the risk factors for and the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH, along with ratings for the strength and certainty of evidence. A 90% to 100% consensus was obtained for almost all recommendations. Several recommendations were rated as having moderate to low certainty. Opportunities for future research were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this consensus statement suggest that current approaches to the treatment and management of PDPH are not uniform due to the paucity of evidence. The practice guidelines, however, provide a framework for individual clinicians to assess PDPH risk, confirm the diagnosis, and adopt a systematic approach to its management.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2325387
JournalJAMA network open
Volume6
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus Practice Guidelines on Postdural Puncture Headache From a Multisociety, International Working Group A Summary Report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this