Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical implications of the universal definition for the prevention and treatment of heart failure

  • Chanchal Chandramouli
  • , Simon Stewart
  • , Wael Almahmeed
  • , Carolyn Su Ping Lam
  • National Heart Centre Singapore
  • National University of Singapore
  • Torrens University Australia
  • University of Glasgow
  • University of Notre Dame Australia
  • University of Groningen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The diagnosis of heart failure (HF) primarily relies on signs and symptoms that are neither sensitive nor specific. This impedes timely diagnosis and delays effective therapies or interventions, despite the availability of several evidence-based treatments for HF. Through monumental collaborative efforts from representatives of HF societies worldwide, the universal definition of HF was published in 2021, to provide the necessary standardized framework required for clinical management, clinical trials, and research. This review elaborates the key concepts of the new universal definition of HF, highlighting the key merits and potential avenues, which can be nuanced further in future iterations. We also discuss the key implications of the universal definition document from the perspectives of various stakeholders within the healthcare framework, including patients, care providers, system/payers and policymakers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S2-S12
JournalClinical Cardiology
Volume45
Issue numberS1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • HFpEF
  • HFrEF
  • NT-proBNP
  • clinical syndrome
  • stakeholders
  • symptoms and signs
  • universal definition of heart failure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical implications of the universal definition for the prevention and treatment of heart failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this