Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?

Pharmacy Practice 2020 peer reviewers

doi:10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284

Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?

Pharmacy Practice 2020 peer reviewers

University of Porto
State University of Tetovo
Beirut Arab University
University of Toronto
University of Colorado
University of Lisbon
University of Sydney
Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Universitas Airlangga
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
University of Illinois at Chicago
Lebanese University
University of New England
University of Petra
Al-Balqa Applied University
University of Ibadan
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Levine Cancer Institute
University of Technology Sydney
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Université Grenoble Alpes
University of Mississippi
University of Wisconsin
Applied Science Private University
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
Cherokee Main Street Pharmacy
Dalhousie University
Campbell University
Universidade Federal do Paraná
Medical University of South Carolina
University of Western Australia
University of Surabaya
Charles University
JP Garrahan Pediatric Hospital
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
University of Kentucky
Marshall Pharmacy
Nova Southeastern University
University of Coimbra
University of Geneva
Barts Health NHS Trust
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
University of Alberta
University of Birmingham
Kyung Hee University
University of Florida
University of Texas
University of South Australia
University of Rhode Island
University of South Florida
Universidade de Brasília
Cairo University
Cardiff University
Charles Sturt University
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
University of Groningen
Belmont University
Long Island University
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
University of Strathclyde
University of Tromsø – The Arctic University of Norway
University of Malta
Jerash Private University
University of Aberdeen
Purdue University
Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists
Egas Moniz Higher Institute of Health Sciences
PharmaceuCare
NSW Health Pathology
Holy Spirit University of Kaslik
Epidemiologie Clinique et Toxicologie (INSPECT-LB)
Linnaeus University
The University of Hong Kong
Universiti Sains Malaysia
University of Aveiro
Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
University of Cincinnati
University of Queensland
University of Sharjah
Oregon State University
Lebanese International University
University of Uyo
University for Business and Technology
University of Copenhagen
Kuwait University
Monash University
University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Utrecht University
University of Belgrade
Disease Control and Prevention Center
University of Rome La Sapienza
El Paso Texas VA
Virginia Commonwealth University
Taylor's University Malaysia
University of Utah
Boston University
University of Central Lancashire
Roseman University of Health Sciences
University of Oklahoma
Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
University of Basel
University of British Columbia
Hospital Universitario Sant Joan d'Alacant
Universidade de São Paulo
University of Otago
Universidad del Desarrollo
Italian Institute of Telemedicine
Obafemi Awolowo University
University of Tasmania
NHS Tayside
impac2t
Flinders University
University of Granada
University of Balochistan
North Dakota State University
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Curtin University
Qatar University
Medical University of Gdańsk
Higher Institute for Health Sciences
Butler University
Thammasat University
University of Tartu
Mahasarakham University
University of Iowa
Prince of Songkla University
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Semmelweis University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Scholarly publishing is in a crisis, with the many stakeholders complaining about different aspects of the system. Authors want fast publication times, high visibility and publications in high-impact journals. Readers want freely accessible, high-quality articles. Peer reviewers want recognition for the work they perform to ensure the quality of the published articles. However, authors, peer reviewers, and readers are three different roles played by the same group of individuals, the users of the scholarly publishing system—and this system could work based on a collaborative publishing principle where “nobody pays, and nobody gets paid”.

Original language	English
Article number	2284
Pages (from-to)	1-6
Number of pages	6
Journal	Pharmacy Practice
Volume	19
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284
State	Published - 1 Jan 2021

Keywords

Cooperative Behavior
Open Access Publishing
Peer Review, Research
Periodicals as Topic

Access to Document

10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284

Cite this

@article{4402447576c84c718172af3248e14a39,

title = "Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?",

abstract = "Scholarly publishing is in a crisis, with the many stakeholders complaining about different aspects of the system. Authors want fast publication times, high visibility and publications in high-impact journals. Readers want freely accessible, high-quality articles. Peer reviewers want recognition for the work they perform to ensure the quality of the published articles. However, authors, peer reviewers, and readers are three different roles played by the same group of individuals, the users of the scholarly publishing system—and this system could work based on a collaborative publishing principle where “nobody pays, and nobody gets paid”.",

keywords = "Cooperative Behavior, Open Access Publishing, Peer Review, Research, Periodicals as Topic",

author = "\{Pharmacy Practice 2020 peer reviewers\} and Fernando Fernandez-Llimos and Edita Alili-Idrizi and Amin, \{Mohamed E.\} and Zubin Austin and Billups, \{Sarah J.\} and Cavaco, \{Afonso M.\} and Collins, \{Jack C.\} and Eserian, \{Jaqueline K.\} and Andi Hermansyah and Janke, \{Kristin K.\} and Jarrett, \{Jennie B.\} and Pascale Salameh and Ieva Stupans and Abdel-Qader, \{Derar H.\} and Dania Abunaser and Rasaq Adisa and Wuraola Akande-Sholabi and Ahmad Al-Azayzih and Selamawit Alemayehu and Alzubaidi, \{Hamzah T.\} and Johanna Aponte-Gonz{\'a}lez and Arnall, \{Justin R.\} and Beata Bajorek and David Balayssac and Bardet, \{Jean Didier\} and Marie Barnard and Susanne Barnett and Basheti, \{Iman A.\} and Arcelio Benetoli and Bennett, \{Shelby A.\} and Emily Black and Bloom, \{Timothy J.\} and Bonetti, \{Aline F.\} and Borba, \{Helena H.\} and Daniel Bradley and Bradshaw, \{Pamela J.\} and Cecilia Brata and Jovana Brkic and David Brumbaugh and Guido, \{Paulo Caceres\} and Cathal Cadogan and Jeffrey Cain and Ron Carico and Carvajal, \{Manuel J.\} and Margarida Castel-Branco and Damien Cateau and Jagjot Chahal and Vincent Chan and Charrois, \{Theresa L.\} and Iffat Elbarazi",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "1--6",

journal = "Pharmacy Practice",

issn = "1885-642X",

publisher = "Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authors, peer reviewers, and readers

T2 - What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?

AU - Pharmacy Practice 2020 peer reviewers

AU - Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando

AU - Alili-Idrizi, Edita

AU - Amin, Mohamed E.

AU - Austin, Zubin

AU - Billups, Sarah J.

AU - Cavaco, Afonso M.

AU - Collins, Jack C.

AU - Eserian, Jaqueline K.

AU - Hermansyah, Andi

AU - Janke, Kristin K.

AU - Jarrett, Jennie B.

AU - Salameh, Pascale

AU - Stupans, Ieva

AU - Abdel-Qader, Derar H.

AU - Abunaser, Dania

AU - Adisa, Rasaq

AU - Akande-Sholabi, Wuraola

AU - Al-Azayzih, Ahmad

AU - Alemayehu, Selamawit

AU - Alzubaidi, Hamzah T.

AU - Aponte-González, Johanna

AU - Arnall, Justin R.

AU - Bajorek, Beata

AU - Balayssac, David

AU - Bardet, Jean Didier

AU - Barnard, Marie

AU - Barnett, Susanne

AU - Basheti, Iman A.

AU - Benetoli, Arcelio

AU - Bennett, Shelby A.

AU - Black, Emily

AU - Bloom, Timothy J.

AU - Bonetti, Aline F.

AU - Borba, Helena H.

AU - Bradley, Daniel

AU - Bradshaw, Pamela J.

AU - Brata, Cecilia

AU - Brkic, Jovana

AU - Brumbaugh, David

AU - Guido, Paulo Caceres

AU - Cadogan, Cathal

AU - Cain, Jeffrey

AU - Carico, Ron

AU - Carvajal, Manuel J.

AU - Castel-Branco, Margarida

AU - Cateau, Damien

AU - Chahal, Jagjot

AU - Chan, Vincent

AU - Charrois, Theresa L.

AU - Elbarazi, Iffat

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - Scholarly publishing is in a crisis, with the many stakeholders complaining about different aspects of the system. Authors want fast publication times, high visibility and publications in high-impact journals. Readers want freely accessible, high-quality articles. Peer reviewers want recognition for the work they perform to ensure the quality of the published articles. However, authors, peer reviewers, and readers are three different roles played by the same group of individuals, the users of the scholarly publishing system—and this system could work based on a collaborative publishing principle where “nobody pays, and nobody gets paid”.

AB - Scholarly publishing is in a crisis, with the many stakeholders complaining about different aspects of the system. Authors want fast publication times, high visibility and publications in high-impact journals. Readers want freely accessible, high-quality articles. Peer reviewers want recognition for the work they perform to ensure the quality of the published articles. However, authors, peer reviewers, and readers are three different roles played by the same group of individuals, the users of the scholarly publishing system—and this system could work based on a collaborative publishing principle where “nobody pays, and nobody gets paid”.

KW - Cooperative Behavior

KW - Open Access Publishing

KW - Peer Review, Research

KW - Periodicals as Topic

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099717445

U2 - 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284

DO - 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:85099717445

SN - 1885-642X

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Pharmacy Practice

JF - Pharmacy Practice

IS - 1

M1 - 2284

ER -

Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this